Main

Flight Training Archives

January 10, 2007

New Goals

I've been a member of the Blue Ash Meteors for 11 years. Unfortunately, the club is dissolving, so, I started looking for a new club to join. I found Victory Aviation based at Butler County Regional Airport. They have a waiting list, so I'm back to renting for a while. Bummer.

I decided use the time to work on my Commercial license. And since I've long considered getting a Fight Instructor (CFI) license, I figured that while I'm in a learning frame of mind, I might as well go ahead and get it as soon as I finish my Commercial. That's followed by an Instrument Instructor license (CFII).

So my goal is to complete my Commercial, CFI, and CFII ratings. Just to make it interesting, I want to try to complete them all by April 8 (the anniversary of receiving my Private license in 1996).

Here's the list of milestones and when I want to complete them:

Commercial Written: February 9
Commercial Checkride: February 16
Fundamentals Of Instructing Written: March 2
Flight Instructor Written: March 9
CFI Checkride: March 16
Instrument Written: April 2
CFII Checkride: April 8

That's a lot in a short time, but it should be doable.

January 17, 2007

Commercial Written Test

I took my Commercial written today and passed with a 98%. I'm a little annoyed, because I should have had a 100%. The two questions I missed were stupid mistakes. I knew the answers, but I wasn't thinking. Oh, well. At least it's out of the way.

February 13, 2007

Update on Commercial Training

Well, I've had a few setbacks. The biggest is the weather. I've had to cancel as many times as I've flown.

The other big setback is that for the Commercial license you need to have a VFR daytime cross country flight of at least two hours and 100 miles with an instructor and another one at night. I've got two hundred hours of cross country time, but no trips that meet all of those criteria. We finally got a break in the weather and flew to Mansfield last Friday evening. We landed just before dark, had dinner, and flew back after dark so we could do both flights in one day.

The other "setback" is that the Commercial training requires 20 hours of training, 10 of which must be instrument training. The instrument training isn't required if you have and Instrument Rating (I do). I've always been told that this means that you only need 10 hours of instruction working on the Commercial specific maneuvers. Then I found this note on the FAA website:

NOTE 4: Applicants for a commercial pilot certificate with the airplane single engine, airplane multiengine, helicopter, gyroplane, or powered-lift ratings and who already holds an instrument rating that is appropriate to the category and class rating sought are not required to accomplish an additional “. . . 10 hours of instrument training . . .” as stated in § 61.129(a)(3)(i); § 61.129(b)(3)(i); § 61.129(c)(3)(i); § 61.129(d)(3)(i); and § 61.129(e)(3)(i). However, the required commercial pilot training hour requirements [i.e., ". . . on the areas of operation listed in § 61.127 . . ."] of 20 hours in § 61.129(a)(3), (b)(3), (c)(3), (d)(3), and (e)(3) cannot be reduced to 10 hours.

So, I need 10 more hours than I expected. Since I had started my Commercial training a few years ago, I already had a couple of hours, and the cross country flights I needed added another four hours, it doesn't set me back too much, but it does send me past my "deadline" for the checkride. I had wanted to do the checkride by February 16 (this Friday), but I won't be ready. I should be able to do it next week sometime, so I'll only be a few days behind schedule.

February 23, 2007

I Passed!

I passed my Commercial checkride today. It's been a stressful week leading up to the checkride. I think the biggest reason is the wait. I flew last Friday and then didn't get to fly again until last night when we went up to fine tune before the checkride. I think if I had been able to take the ride earlier in the week it wouldn't have been as bad.

Anyway, the practical test began at 11:00. I showed up at 10:30 to make sure I had everything I needed, including the airplane logbooks. I spent about 15 minutes going through the checklist to make sure I had everything and reviewing the airplane's logs to make sure everything was properly tagged with Post-It notes. Then I spent 15 minutes walking around the FBO waiting for the examiner to be ready. We had two hours scheduled for the oral and two hours scheduled for the flight test.

The oral started out by reviewing all of my paperwork. First reviewing my 8710 and logbook to make sure I had the aeronautical experience required for the commercial certificate. Photo ID, current license and medical; you have a third class medical, what limits does that place on your commercial license?

Once that was completed, we reviewed the airplane log books: explain the logbooks to me; what are the important inspections in the log books; when was the ELT inspected; when does the battery need to be replaced; when will the next annual inspection have to be completed; what about the next 100 hour inspection; what are AD's; what kind of AD's are there?

Moving on to weather: straight forward weather questions followed by "based on your review of today's forecast, is our flight a go or no-go?" (CAVU, light wind, we're a go.)

So far so good. Here's where we started running into problems. I was instructed to plan a trip from HAO to BNA (Nashville). The straight line course would put us right through the middle of the Cincinnati Class B. Having flown around here for over ten years, I know that the would vector us around the class B, so I just planned ahead and plotted my course around it. The DE didn't like that. What's the shortest distance between two points? I explained my reasoning, but what it comes down to is that she wanted me to demonstrate dealing with being vectored around by ATC and getting back on course. I offered to redo the first leg of the trip to go through the class B, but she said not to worry about it. She was clearly disappointed, however. So then we looked at my navigation log. I had planned it so the time would start at my first checkpoint (an NDB a mile from the field) rather than the field itself. I used the POH charts for time, distance, and fuel to climb to plan the fuel usage to the first checkpoint, which worked to be about the right distance to climb to my planned altitude of 3000 feet (which is approximately 2400 AGL for the area and therefore not subject to standard VFR altitudes). Which was another point of contention. She was concerned about planning the VFR flight at an IFR altitude. I didn't want to get into a debate about that, but my thought is that that 3000 feet is not an IFR altitude for this flight since the lowest OROCA for the route is 3200. I had planned it at 3000 feet so we didn't spend the first half an hour of the flight test climbing to altitude. Moral of the story: plan it as a real flight and don't try to optimize the flight for purposes of the test.

Oh, she also was annoyed that I didn't put the FSS frequency on in the frequencies section: what frequency are you going to contact FSS on to file your flight plan? (If I were to actually file it, I would call them on the telephone before we took off.) Well, I guess that's an option, but you don't have the telephone number there either.

Next we covered the sectional chart: what class airspace is this, what are the weather minimums there; what type of airspace is this and what are the floor and ceiling; what airspace is below it; what are the visibility requirements for the class G here; what about here; what's the airspace around Indianapolis; what are the equipment requirements to fly there; do you need a transponder to fly under it; what about over it; what is this little box here with the radio frequency in it; what is the airspace around Cincinnati; what are the equipment requirements to fly there; do you need a transponder to fly under it (you need a transponder to fly anywhere within the 30-mile mode-C ring regardless of altitude, answering the most likely next two questions); why doesn't it have the contact frequencies like Indianapolis (I had never noticed that before, so I didn't have an answer; they're on the TAC, which, fortunately I carry); what are these white boxes around Indianapolis and Cincinnati (Indianapolis detail is an inset chart; Cincinnati detail is in the Cincinnati TAC); what's this area with the magenta hash marks; what about this one with the blue hash marks; what's class A airspace; what are the requirements to fly there.

Moving on, we covered the weight and balance next. Her first comment: your instructor didn't give you a weight and balance sheet for the plane? (Apparently the FBO has W&B worksheets for each plane; I just did it in the Notes section of the navigation log.) Well, fortunately, I had done the W&B for wheels up and wheels down for both departure and arrival. She was happy to see that I did all four and proceeded to discuss how some planes have a very narrow CG envelope, so it's important to make sure you will be in CG when landing as well as before you take off. This was followed by demonstrating how to use the 50ft obstacle clearance take off and landing charts for the flight we had planned using the aircraft weight from the W&B and the temperature and winds from the weather briefing I printed out from DUATS.

Next we talked about the aircraft systems. She asked me about the operation of the flaps, powerplant, prop, landing gear, hydraulic system (landing gear and brakes), fuel system, electrical system (including the effect on the landing gear system in the event of power loss), and "does the aircraft have any deicing equipment" (only an alternate air intake and pitot heat; it's a trick question because most people forget those; fortunately my CFI prepped me specifically for that question).

Then we moved on to aeromedical factors. This was all straight forward discussion of hypoxia, hyperventilation, sinus and middle ear infections of both pilots and passengers, and spatial disorientation. She had a story about a charter flight she had had with a man and his young daughter who had an ear infection and had trouble with pressure in her ears when they descended so they had to descend at go back up and then descend at 200 feet per minute to deal with it; I followed that up with story about a scuba dive I had once where I had trouble getting my ears to clear, so I can sympathize. That led to a discussion about residual nitrogen and decompression sickness. We finished up with a story about a pilot she knew who drank and smoked heavily and as a result couldn't fly above about 6000 feet; I related a story about a flight I had taken with a friend who was a heavy smoker: we were cruising at 11,500 feet and he started getting dizzy and lightheaded, so we had to descend to 9,500 for the rest of the flight. (That led to a discussion about why flying over the Appalachians at least 10,000 feet is more comfortable than below 10,000 and her experiences with it versus my experiences.) That led to the obvious: what are the oxygen requirements for crew and passengers. We also discussed how the eyes work in the day versus night and what effects altitude had on night vision.

That's about all I can remember from the oral. We finished at about 12:20, so it took about an hour after we went through the required paperwork.

That gave me almost 45 minutes to relax before the flight portion of the test. I used the opportunity to grab a drink and a candy bar. I went down to the hangar to preflight the plane (a Piper Arrow III) about 12:45 so we could get started right at 1:00. Unfortunately, no one showed up to get the plane out of the hangar until 1:35, so I spent half an hour just shooting the breeze with the DE (and answering a few questions about airplane systems while we were standing there next to it). We had a seeming casual conversation about people getting lost and doing stupid things instead of the using ATC or the various navaids to figure out where you are. This included a story that about one night when she was hanging out at the FBO when a plane landed and two people get out. One said he was a CFI and that the other was his student and he was wondering what airport they were at; they were trying to get to Lunken. We had a good laugh about the cluelessness of the CFI and talked about the various things he could have done (not the least of which is not admit he is a CFI with a student and got lost to a bunch of pilots and line workers at an unknown FBO). Looking back, it occurs to me that this wasn't a casual conversation: we were covering the PTS task on lost procedures.

We finally got going, and I went through the passenger briefing (in the event of an emergency I will be handing you this checklist and have you read this procedure to make sure we don't miss anything; in the event of an off-airport landing you will need to unlatch the door prior to landing; after landing we will egress the aircraft as quickly as possible and rendezvous at the rear of the plane; the aircraft is equipped with an Emergency Locator Transmitter to inform search parties of our location; additionally, I have a hand held transceiver, so in the unlikely event of an emergency, we will still be able to contact authorities so we won't be stuck out in the middle of nowhere). Then we moved on to the starting and taxiing procedures; check of the ASOS to verify the prevailing winds and active runway hadn't changed while we were standing around in the hangar. Discussed the reasons for the before takeoff checklist items as I did them. Make a short field take off.

As we climbed out I performed the climbout procedures (gear and flaps up, at 500 feet set the throttle, prop, and mixture to the climbout settings, turn off the fuel pump) and then turned on course. As we passed the first checkpoint (the NDB), I noted the time and mentally calculated the ETA to our next checkpoint (ETE 4:33). After a couple of minutes she asked me what the time was to our next checkpoint, which I answered, and then she asked if I had written down the time on takeoff. Since I had planned the flight from the first checkpoint, not the airport, I answered no, I started the time from the first checkpoint. That didn't make her happy and she scolded me for it.

We reached the next checkpoint 10 seconds late, which made me happy: 10 seconds is pretty good. I made a joke about not hitting it right on was a good thing because if I had, that had to mean that something was wrong. About that time she said, OK, we have bad weather in front of us, divert to Oxford (OXD). I stated that OXD was almost due north of the checkpoint we just passed, so we should turn to 360 and look for the airport nearly straight ahead or slightly to the right. She asked how long it would take, and I estimated 2:30 based on the current airspeed adjusted for the almost non-existent wind out of the north east. About two minutes later, I rechecked the chart and realized the railroad tracks that I had been looking at were the ones to the west of the field, not the ones to the east of the field. I stated this out loud, along with the approximate location of the airport based on my revised position estimate and the airport was exactly where I pointed, about a mile and a half away. Let's go land.

After turning toward the field, I called unicom for a an airport advisory. No response, so I stated that we would approach the airport assuming the active runway was 5 based on what the winds where in the area. I flew an upwind leg to get verify the winds with the windsock. About halfway up the leg, someone finally responded to the request for the airport advisory. That verified my guess of the active runway. We did a short field landing. After a back taxi, we did a soft field take off followed by a soft field landing. Finally, we back taxied and did a normal takeoff and turned to the east to go do the maneuvers.

We started with steep turns (which I came close to blowing: I said we were going to start them at 2500, but I actually started them at 2550 and the altitude fluctuated between 2650 and 2550 during the maneuver, which could have been seen as blowing the altitude if she had assumed the starting altitude was 2500 like I stated I was going to do; the only comment was "your altitude was a little sloppy on that"). Next we did slow flight, power off stall, then power on stall. The power on stall gave us some of the altitude we needed to do the steep spiral. These all went fine, and we moved on to the eights on pylons. I had more trouble with them then usual and ended up having to go around three times before I had good points picked out and managed to get it right. After we rolled out of the last one, I went to increase my altitude so we could move on to the next maneuver when I noticed that I still had one notch of flaps down from the the steep spiral maneuver. I tried to discretely bring it in, but she noticed it and made a comment about it. I played it off as the reason why I was having so much trouble with the eights on. Her only other comment was "well, I didn't notice it either". Oh well. We finished up with lazy eights (one turn in each direction) and a chandelle to whichever side I wanted (I picked left because I have more trouble getting the turn to complete before the stall horn starts squealing when I turn to the right).

All of the maneuvers done, we headed back to the airport. On the way she had me go over the emergency engine out procedures and then perform an emergency gear extension. Back at the airport we did an 180° power off landing. I had been having trouble with being too long on this maneuver until I started extending my downwind leg a little before turning base. As I was doing this my examiner said something to the effect "you don't want to wait too long to turn because thing drops like a rock". Being that I was mental mush by this point, I immediately turned to base. As soon as I turned I realized I was going to be long. I mentioned that fact and she concurred and said that she messed me up. I salvaged it by dumping the flaps and diving for the deck to make as shallow of an approach as I could. I managed to get a stall horn as I flared and got the main wheels to touch down close enough. I think my earlier short field landing that touched down right on the numbers helped me here. She again stated that she messed me up, so it was OK, taxi back to the hangar.

I stopped after clearing the runway and performed the after landing checklist. I had even remembered not to bring in the flaps until I was stopped off of the runway. I was taught to bring the flaps in as soon as the plane is on the ground to increase braking efficiency and reduce the likelihood of a wind gust causing the plane to go airborne again. My CFI told me that my examiner felt that this was a big no-no. It took me four of the five weeks of my training to get over this 10+ year habit.

We parked the plane and she said she was going to go back to office to start typing. She instructed me to fill out my logbook and leave the remarks section blank. So, while I was assuming I had passed at this point, she didn't say. After securing the plane and paying the bill, she brought out my temporary airman certificate for Commercial Pilot, Airplane Single Engine Land, Instrument Airplane.

I'm so glad that's over! Now I have to decide what I'm going to go after next. I had originally planned on going to CFI, but now I'm considering doing Commercial Multi Engine Instrument or Commercial Helicopter (I have almost 50 hours of helicopter time already) first, and then going for the CFI.

I'll think about it for a few days and decide next week.

March 6, 2007

Back In The Saddle

I had my first CFI lesson today. I couldn't wait to get into the right seat for the first time. At least the first time in the air: I probably have over five hours of taxi time in the right seat.

Well, I'm still waiting. We spent an hour going through the preflight checklist and aircraft systems on the Arrow. My CFI had me explain everything down to the last detail. It was kind of fun, actually. It had been a long time since I had gone through an entire airplane in that kind of detail. It was reassuring that I still knew everything (except which antenna is which). There were a couple of times when I explained things as I would a new student, but she wanted full explanations that would be beyond a new student's comprehension. So, in those cases, I pointed out why I went with the simple explanation and then proceeded with the full explanation.

After we finished with that, we filled out some paperwork and called it a day. So, hopefully we'll get some flight time on Friday. Saturday is looking like a rain-out, so we'll probably do more ground work.

I'm going to take the FOI written on Friday or Monday (depending on how much studying I get in by tomorrow night). Then I'll shoot for about March 19 for the CFI written.

As for the training, the estimate is 10 hours of flight instruction and 15 hours of ground instruction, so figuring about 1.5 hours per lesson, that comes out to about 17 lessons. With three to four lessons a week, I should be done in less than five weeks, which is longer than my original plan, but still pretty quick. That sets me up to take my checkride around April 8, which is when I was hoping to take my checkride for CFII. Still, if I can have the CFII done before Turkey season starts on April 23, I'll be happy. If I don't take a week off between CFI and CFII (like I did after my commercial) then I should be able to do it. Otherwise I won't be able to start on the CFII until the middle or end of May.

After all of that, I have to decide whether or not I want to go straight into a multi-engine rating or if I want to take a break from learning and maybe spend some time teaching...

March 9, 2007

Fundamentals Of Instruction Written Test

Well, I took the FOI written today. Sometimes I wonder if I don't purposely miss easy questions just so I don't get 100%.

The FOI written is 50 questions. You have an hour and a half. My practice tests were taking me about 8 and a half minutes and I was scoring 100%. I took my time today and finished in 10 minutes. I went back and reviewed all of my answers so I used up 20 minutes. I walked out confident that I had 100%.

But, no, I had to blow an easy question: "A written test has validity when it". Simple question. Simple answer: "measures what it is supposed to measure". I answered "yields a consisten result", which, of course, is the answer for "A written test that has reliability".

That's two written tests in a row that I should have had 100% on and I blew it over something stupid.

Introduction To The Right Seat

Today was my introduction to the right seat. It was pretty interesting, especially since I was flying a 152, which I have flown in at least five years. It was a lot of fun. 152's are so easy to fly. It's relaxing to not have to think about the gear and prop or fuel flows and EGT's. Just get up in the air and fly.

One thing I noticed right away: I spent more time looking outside the cockpit when I was performing maneuvers. I guess that's because it takes more effort to look at the instruments from the right seat. Doing power off stalls without looking at the airspeed or AI was different. I don't think I had ever done that. I was surprised at how shallow the pitch was compared to what it feels like when you are focused on the instruments. When I'm focusing on the instruments, it feels like I'm pitching up about 45 degrees (and even more for a power on stall). Seeing the reality of it makes stalls pretty unexciting.

I had trouble getting the plane down during our crash and dashes. I guess I am used to flying faster planes, so I wasn't getting the airspeed down quick enough. One approach was bad enough to warrant a go around, which I executed even worse than the approach. It made me realize how much of my flying is done automatically. I had to look down to find the flaps. Then I moved it up too far, so we lost two notches instead of one. I was pushing pretty hard on the yoke to counteract the flaps when I went to full throttle, so when I lost two notches of flaps, the plane got a pretty good dip before I corrected. In spite of all of that, it was still fun. I think most of my trouble was based on being in the 152 rather than being in the right seat. I'll get to test that theory next lesson: we'll be flying the Arrow next time. Almost 75% of my time is in Archers, C-6's, and the Arrow, so I won't have the "new plane" excuse. (-:

April 2, 2007

I'm an AGI now...

I passed my Advanced Ground Instructor (AGI) and Flight Instructor - Airplane (FIA) written tests today (98 and 97 respectively). I proceeded straight from the testing center to the FSDO to be issued my shiny (not really) new Ground Instructor - Advanced Temporary Airman Certificate. After passing FAA checkrides for my various pilot certificates and ratings, the AGI just doesn't seem to be that big of a deal. But, here's a scary thought: I can legally teach aviation now. Granted, it's just ground school, but there's a lot of material that I'm authorized to impart on others.

According to the FARs I can:

Sec. 61.215 - Ground instructor privileges.

(b) A person who holds an advanced ground instructor rating is authorized to provide:

(1) Ground training in the aeronautical knowledge areas required for the issuance of any certificate or rating under this part;

(2) Ground training required for any flight review; and

(3) A recommendation for a knowledge test required for the issuance of any certificate under this part.

So I can legally provide one half of the training required for any pilot certificate or rating except Instrument ratings. That includes rotorcraft, gliders, and blimps. I've never even been in a blimp, but I can legal teach ground school for it... Of course, airspace, navigation, and weather are the same regardless of the category and class of aircraft you're flying, but still. It would seem odd to be giving someone instruction for a balloon pilot's license when I've never been closer than 100 feet to one.

What an odd concept.

May 12, 2007

You Spin Me 'Round...

To become a CFI, you must be trained in spin entry and recovery. The theory is that you should have some experience recovering from spins in case a student puts you into a spin during training. I suppose that makes sense, but that didn't make me any happier about doing it. Generally, my fear of heights doesn't bother me when I'm flying. But when I'm doing stalls, it seems to get to me. It really comes down to whether I'm looking straight ahead or if I'm looking all around while doing the stall. If I'm looking straight ahead, I always feel like I'm in a much steeper attitude than I really am (like 45 degrees or something). Reality is that in a power on stall, 15 degrees is about it, unless you just yank it up hard. In a power off stall it's even less. But again, that didn't help my nerves when we went out to do spin training.

We used a Cessna 152, which is incredibly forgiving and takes work to put into a spin. We spent most of the flight getting up to altitude. Once we got to about 5,000 ft, we did a power off stall, and just as it started to stall, kicked in full left rudder. Over we go and about .75 seconds later we're in a steep dive. Not much of a spin. Maybe a half turn. The "recovery" was letting off the rudder. So we climbed back up to altitude and did the same thing to the right. I remembered to hold the rudder in a little longer this time so we got about 2/3 of a turn. Then we flew home.

Less than 45 minutes in the air and about two minutes of it was spent in stalling, spinning and recovering the plane. The rest was flying to the practice area, climbing to altitude, and flying home.

I'm planning on taking some acrobatic training one day. Maybe I'll get to do some good spins then...

July 20, 2007

It's Over!

My CFI training is finally over! I passed the checkride today and have my temporary certificate in hand!

This checkride has been the worst one I've done as far as being worked up for it. The actual test itself wasn't bad. You definitely need to know your stuff, but if you are prepared, it's not particularly difficult. Just long.

One thing to remember is that the examiner is not asking you questions to see if you know the answer, but to see if you can teach it. Use the tools at your disposal. Make sure the room you use has a whiteboard and use it. And when you are teaching from the whiteboard, make sure you are facing the examiner when you are talking. My examiner complemented me on doing that and mentioned that a lot of CFI candidates talk to the board. Remember that you are acting as an instructor on this test. Be in command of the information and don't guess at what you are unsure of. Bring your entire reference library with you. Know where to find everything. When the examiner asks you a question that no one on earth would know off the top of his head, pull out the right book and turn right to it.

One example, I was asked how to fill out the address field on an 8710 if your mailing address is a post office box. That's not something that I've ever had to worry about, but I had read the instructions for the 8710 and remembered seeing something about that. So I picked up the 8710, turned to the instructions and pointed out exactly what you are supposed to do. My examiner liked asking questions that required me to go to the FARs, obviously testing me on my knowledge of where to find things rather than what I had memorized for the test.

The only thing he really corrected me on during the oral was one of the wing diagrams I drew showed the wing from the right side instead of the left side like you normally see it. He wanted everything to be drawn from the standard viewpoint. His point was that when you teach weight and balance it's easier to show the view of the left side of the plane (since positive numbers indicating distance from the datum are more logically displayed increasing to the right). So you should make all of your airplane drawings from the same view for consistency.

To be prepared for this test you must understand everything you had to know for your private and commercial checkrides, plus your privileges and responsibilities as an instructor. By understand, I mean you need to know the why, not just the what. You will spend far more time studying for this checkride than you have for any checkride before.

As for the flight portion of the checkride, it's pretty straight forward. Just make sure you can fly every maneuver from the private and commercial PTS from the right seat to commercial standards while explaining exactly what you are doing and why you're doing it. Anyone who can pass the commercial checkride can do the flying portion of the CFI checkride. You just have to practice from the right seat. It took me about 10-15 hours to get to commercial standards in the right seat (mostly the landings). The difficult part is being able to explain what you're doing while you're doing it and understand how to correct the mistakes students will make.

I really think that if I wasn't so worked up over it being a checkride, it would have actually been fun. But it was a checkride, so fun doesn't really describe it.

I'm just glad it's over...

February 9, 2008

So That's What It's All About

I finally started using my CFI certificate today. I've done some ground training, but nothing formal, and up until today, my scheduled training flights had been canceled for various reasons.

So today I got my feet wet by giving a BFR and doing a checkout flight for the club's Archer. The executive summary is: I really enjoyed it.

My "student" has been flying longer than I have and has over one hundred hours flying Archers (along with lots of hours in other Pipers). The only issue was he hadn't flown a powered plane in a couple of years (just some glider time). So we started out with a thorough preflight to cover all the systems on this particular plane and then taxied out to the runway. A normal takeoff to start, then off to the practice area. All was going well, but it was a little windy and getting windier. This resulted in a bumpy ride so our stalls and slow flight practice where challenging, but successful. We went over the engine out procedures, then flew on to Miami (Oxford) University to do some landings.

We practiced all the various takeoffs and landings: normal, short field, soft field, and various flap configurations. I could definitely see his rust, but it wasn't too bad and he was obviously competent, so we headed back home to sign him off.

So I signed my first log book with 1.8 hours of training. When it was all over, I was looking around for someone else to fly with. In the end I just took the Saratoga for a sight seeing tour on my own.

It was fun. I'm looking forward to my next lesson.

About Flight Training

This page contains an archive of all entries posted to Mark's Pilot Log in the Flight Training category. They are listed from oldest to newest.

$100 Hamburger Trips is the previous category.

Hangar Talk is the next category.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34